A guide for the perplexed.
Hello and Peace be upon you;
This is my first blogging attempt. It is a collection of my random thoughts --- I cover Science; Humanities; Arts and Theology and indeed more realms than one ... Philosophy; Political Economy; Commerce to name few.
I welcome your support and feedback.
Happy Reading!
Cheers: SAM also known as (aka) SAMiR
Diploma in Microbiology/BSc; BBA;
Master of International Relations@Macquarie; Sydney; Australia.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Low-cost DNA decoding machine developed
Low-cost DNA decoding machine developed
Seen as an exceptional advance that can change medicine, the "$1,000 genome" is just around the corner.
A biotechnology company says it has developed a machine that will decode a person's DNA in a day for $1,000.
That price has long been cited as a key step toward making a person's genome useful for medical care.
Life Technologies Corp. said on Tuesday it was taking orders for the
technology, which it expects to deliver in about a year. The company
says three major research institutions had already signed up for the
$149,000 machine.
Technically speaking the machine is a sequencer. That means it can
identify the sequence of the 3 billion chemical building blocks that
make up a person's DNA.
The machine is 1,000 times more powerful than existing technology,
said Jonathan Rothberg, CEO and chairman of Life Technologies.
Taking up about as much space as an office printer, it can sequence
an entire genome in a single day rather than six to eight weeks required
only a few years ago.
Ethical minefield
The new sequencer, says cardiologist Eric Topol, chief academic
officer of private California hospital and doctor network Scripps
Health, "represents an exceptional advance and can change medicine."
Other scientists and physicians, however, say it could lead
to widespread whole-genome sequencing even of people who are not ill.
And that raises ethical, legal, and medical issues that experts are only
beginning to grapple with.
"I'm a big proponent of bringing genetics into the clinic," says
Thomas Quertermous, chief of the division of cardiovascular medicine at
Stanford University and an expert in the genetics of heart disease. "But
it has to be done in a timely way, and not before its time."
Babies might be first in line for whole-genome sequencing.
In the US, for instance, newborns are required to be screened for at
least 29 genetic diseases. "If the cost of whole-genome sequencing gets
sufficiently low, you could sequence all the genes in a newborn" for
less than the individual tests and follow-ups required when one comes
back positive, said Richard Lifton, chairman of the genetics department
at Yale University.
"I'm increasingly confident that's going to happen. But we need to be
careful how we utilize this information. Do you tell a new-born’s
parents his apoE status" -- that is, whether he has the form of a gene
that raises the risk of Alzheimer's disease?
Access to DNA data by insurers and employers could also raise new problems.
Lifton foresees a "zero-dollar genome," making it likely that "we
will just do it as part of routine clinical care" for children and
adults.
No comments:
Post a Comment